Tag Archives: amazon

Do I Get a Kindle, and Which One?

As Amazon, Kindle, or tech watchers know, Amazon released new versions of their very popular Kindle eBook readers early last week. My Aunt wrote me yesterday and asked me my opinion about the announcement (she’s a huge fan of the Kindle and a voracious reader). So, instead of writing an email, I figure I’ll take this opportunity to write a tech-related posted on my blog.

In one word, my response is… impressive. They’ve come a long way, baby, with the Kindle since the first generation, which I was a happy owner of. Really, there’s two Kindle’s to speak of, especially if you’re a current owner of an older generation. The Kindle Touch and the Kindle Fire. The first is simply a evolutionary enhancement from the last generation. If you’re happy with your current Kindle, I wouldn’t bother updating. On the other hand, if you hate using the directional buttons click click click click to navigate, it might be an option. The screen is marginally better, and it’s marginally lighter, but not a big enough difference to make the upgrade cost effective.

The Kindle Fire, of course, is the big news. It’s really the first real threat to the 800 pound gorilla in the tablet space, the iPad. To get this out of the way, it’s NOT a feature-by-feature match with the iPad, and it wasn’t supposed to be. It’s smaller, has less battery life, and is less suited for non-media applications. Think of it like this — they start in different places with different goals. The iPad was always meant to be a tabula rasa, with it’s applications providing it’s usefulness, but with Apple not really going out of it’s way to make it good at any one thing. It’s a jack of all trades. The Kindle Fire, though, knows what it wants to do: provide you with a platform for consuming Amazon-sourced content. Books, of course, but also their digital music, TV shows, movies, and games. In those areas, I suspect it’ll compete rather well with the iPad. It has the full force of the Amazon media ecosystem behind it, second only to Apple’s, and vastly superior to any other competitor. In other jobs, it’ll likely be not a top performer.

This, of course, is all speculation. The announcements have been made, but the reviewers haven’t got the slabs of plastic in their hot little hands to really dig into yet. I’ll close with this: when I bought my iPad, I gave up the Kindle. I’m seriously thinking about getting one again, though. The iPad just isn’t a great eBook reader. It’s too heavy, and the screen is just pathetic in the sun. If I do pull the trigger for the third time, though, it’ll be the Kindle Touch, not the Fire. It’s hard to imagine the Fire being really superior to the iPad in anything except eBook reading.

Fairness and Taxes

Very recently, the Colorado state government decided to pass a law that forces Amazon to collect state sales tax. Amazon promptly closed their Associates program in Colorado rather than deal with this. The reason? It’s too freaking onerous for an online retailer with an innovative system like their Associates program to deal with every single government tax agency, from the IRS all the way down to municipal levels. There’s a good piece on the Denver Post that deals a great blow to the stupidity of the legislature on this measure: read it if you’re interested in the story further.

The point I wanted to add to this was regarding the issue of “fairness”. Harsanyi at the Post writes:

Once you get past the hyperbole of embarrassed legislators, the argument— and it has appeal — is that there is a lack of “fairness.” Why should out-of-state online stores have an advantage over the traditional stores in the state?

Well, Amazon came up with better technology, it offers better services and, thus far, it has had a far superior business model. That’s why. Let’s leave the slippery concept of “fairness” to toddlers and legislators.

I’ll add to that: how is sales tax “fair”? Seriously, now, how it is? I have some money I worked my butt off to earn and I want to go buy a CD to listen to on the weekend. It’s listed at $10, but I have to pay another buck (or whatever) to the state actually take possession of it. No one is doubting that, strictly speaking, they have the raw power to pass these laws (try not paying your taxes and see what happens), but is it “fair”, in the sense of lack of injustice? I don’t think so.

If you’re talking about “fair” as in everyone should be treated equally, then I’m sure those same legislators would be against any sort of progressive income tax, since it’s not “fair”. For me and not for thee, right?

Thankfully, Oregon doesn’t have a sales tax (yet), so this won’t be an issue for us any time really soon. I hope.